The
architect/evil genius is leaving the White House. I'm sort of sad. [Don't worry my liberal friends, keep reading.] There's so little these days to get excited about in domestic politics. Yes, there's lots to be frustrated or sad or
potentially hopeful about, but not much blood boiling excitement. Even Rove has been
off his game lately, which has made politics a lot less, hmm, fun is not the word, but less stimulating certainly. Karl Rove and other great political strategists both impress (through their skills) and nauseate me; like 'em or not, they do tend to create some excitement in politics, definite stimulus for better or worse. So it's a bit of a sad day. I said a
bit.
Not that you asked but...Does anyone else sense that there is an informed apathy about our times? Maybe it's information overload, but that makes it no less distressing. We are bombarded daily with images from Iraq. People saw
Hotel Rwanda and still hear this "genocide" bandied about, maybe you read that little snippet in the print news last week about how the latest civil war events in Sudan have hurt both sides. Or what about that little military prison we maintain down in Guantanamo, Cuba, anyone remember that place? [Just an aside that intrigues me: We apparently
can't let some of the people we've warehoused there go, as they would be in more danger at home than in prison. Not that this is a new concept with prisons and parolees, and there's
always a risk of letting "bad guys" go if nothing else, but it seems a tad ironic in this case.]
All of these unhappy, deadly, life- and dignity-affecting events bring about a moment's distress, an hour or two, maybe even an hour each week, when we actually pay enough attention to hear about it in the first place. But what do we do? We put a "
Save Darfur" link on our facebook page (a marginally do-good thing for an obviously big problem) then electronically poke our friends (a mindless fun thing). We tune in for a few minutes to Live Earth (a marginally do-good thing) then complain about how hot/cold/rainy it is or how bad the traffic is while driving alone in our car and how expensive the gas while driving an overly large car or a poorly maintained one. [Just an aside: check out gas prices in Europe, where they're paying 2-3 Euros
per liter. Do the math,
3.875 liters to 1 gallon.]
Don't get me wrong, I am not claiming all innocence. I do a bit to help the world, but probably far more that hurts. Maybe I should turn my attention inward rather than outward. In truth I usually do. [I am racked with guilt as a result. ;)] But that
was not my point. Right, what
was my point? Ah, yes, that apathy seems on the rise but in a new form. People seem to feel they are informed on various sad issues, sympathetic to them as well, but just as un/involved as ever. Being informed and doing nothing makes such a person's apathy more distressing. What does it mean when you willingly acknowledge things as bad and then let them continue? Ah, yes, accesory to the crime. Or maybe that's human. We can only do so much, after all. (This is a bitter pill which I refuse to swallow, but I pay it lip service from time to time.)
This brings me back to good old Mr. Rove and his
fellow truth filterers. I think they are the granddaddies of this informed apathy as I will call it, or at least should be the honorary captains. These people have learned to accept that there is good and bad in the world and that the voting public doesn't always know what's good for them or care what's good for others, things I regretfully accept as true. Plus, they know that people take action when and if they feel compelled to do so, and external motivators can be so much more powerful than internal ones. Rove, Luntz,
et al know people will generally do what seems the best choice among what
also happens to be the easiest or most popular choice. So their work becomes the retitling, rebranding, renaming of distasteful choices into favorable sounding options (and yes, it's almost all in the point of view. Check out Frank Luntz's book
Words That Work, subtitled "It's not what you say, it's what people hear"). So those in control present us with their slate of desirable choices that hint at doing good for the world over the terrible undesirable choices of "other people" (bad people, naughty people, those who disagree with us). What we get in the end are a bunch of one-sided political decisions made on our behalf without imparting the feeling that we participated in anything distasteful. After all, I was an American for freedom and justice and individual rights, etc. Who can argue with that?
In theory this is not a bad thing. It only becomes a problem when you turn over real control to those people and they use their powers for evil. Worse still, evil in the name of good. Alas, we tend to realize this kind of thing occurring only after the fact (um, can anyone name a few good examples in history?). I'd prefer not to get to that point in my own personal experience, and I prefer not to live in denial either.
All of this has evolved into one of my standard messages: Inform yourselves and get involved, people. Work for good, after having thought about what good is. And never count on someone else to do good
for you. Now go read
Bowling Alone.
Wow, a farewell comment to Karl Rove in the White House turned into a meandering rant about social engagement. My initial comment was wrong. It seems there's always something to get
me excited about in politics. Soapbox done.